Mathematical Proof of humanity’s intelligence

Humans pride themselves on their intelligence. Really?

As best as we can ascertain, in your scientific and juridical law, the meaning of each discovery or invention, the essence of any important idea, can be expressed by a simple sentence, consisting of a hundred words out of a 50,000 word vocabulary, including mathematical and other specific symbols. The total quantity of possible sentences of that vocabulary is represented by a very modest figure, 100. If we consider only those sentences that have an analytic function, that is to convey meaning — the number will be reduced to 50. Now, if we also eliminate those sentences that are grammatically correct but lack even the slightest discernible meaning, the quantity of meaningful sentences remaining will be reduced to 25. Finally, if we then select the false statements from true ones, being generous with the former in our evaluation, we have only 3-10 statements remaining that actually correspond to reality. Meanwhile, we know some examples of life forms from several other planets that are capable of showing at least the same number of various unconditioned reactions to different combinations of external stimuli that are quite consonant with reality; however these life forms cannot be called intelligent. There are such species on your planet too. Evidently, it would be more correct to consider humanity not intelligent, but a potentially intelligent race, because the limitations of your thought processes, as you should have already gathered, are not of congenital origin.

You try to quantify just about everything and at the same time you cannot even provide precise information about the strength of the wind, expressing it simply in binary concepts of “yes” and “no”, “it is” or “it isn’t” and, moreover, without the expectation of any meaningful understanding of those statements.

Arithmetical quantification led you to new problems, brought about more by the primitiveness of your thinking than by the exigencies of reality. So you waste your energy trying to solve them, seeing them as real anomalies of nature that are difficult to harmonize with your world view. One example: your dealing with rational and irrational numbers as if they had a real scale. Binary logic forces you to fragment and artificially separate solid perceptions into independent facts, occurrences, conceptions, and categories, artificially separating them one from the other.

Arithmetical quantification led you to new problems, brought about more by the primitiveness of your thinking than by the exigencies of reality. So you waste your energy trying to solve them, seeing them as real anomalies of nature that are difficult to harmonize with your world view. One example: your dealing with rational and irrational numbers as if they had a real scale. Binary logic forces you to fragment and artificially separate solid perceptions into independent facts, occurrences, conceptions, and categories, artificially separating them one from the other.

You believe that moving from the highest level of abstraction to the lowest common denominator is the only correct way to proceed. On the contrary, it is really just the opposite. It is no accident that all your abstract constructs, called philosophical systems, are self-contradicting, even though they are based on a common logic.

Step by step, descending into darkness along levels of abstraction, step by step, losing connection with reality, little by little your philosophical systems lose their orientation and finally at the “dead end” of their progression you are forced to answer the meaningless question about the priority of matter over spirit, by a “yes” or a “no.” Because of the weakness of your logical foundation you are limited in your ability to finely differentiate between objects and events, basing your distinctions upon a variety of notations, which are quite chaotic and illogical even from the point of view of your own logic. This is very easily proven, for instance, in the case of human language, where the distinctions are quite inexact.

Your method of communication, which you claim as one of the superior achievements of the human mind, is based upon the establishment of such meaningless differentiations. If you calculate the number of meaningful sentences in your language, you will see how primitive it is as a method of informational exchange, and is, rather, a way to limit that process. And it is not an achievement of intellect, only a transient, dysfunctional step in the early stage of human evolution.

Considering language as an instrument for both exchanging and conveying information, you have not yet noticed how much it impacts your way of thinking, how inevitably it forces you into the very same process of fragmentation and compartmentalization. Thus your ethics and esthetics, particularly, contain a multitude of conceptual pairs that are mutually contradictory, such as thesis and antithesis.

The Final Appeal Volume 1 Nicolai Levoshav

Advertisements

The reason All Religions are Evil

All religions were created by Enki. Enki is Lucifer. The Monotheistic Religions are all tied to blood, and that is directly linked to black Magic, therefore the Spell in those religions, are the greatest and hardest to break free from. Enki has put our World upside down, and that is why everything is so messed up in our World.

Our minds are very powerful, and when the right hemisphere is acknowledged and utilized, everything is possible. That is the pearl among the crap.

We are the Life Force Energy of the universe, and our right hemisphere of our brain verifies that. We are all brothers and sisters. I am the Life Force Energy of the Universe Energy of the World, and so are you. The right hemisphere of your brain can access you to Nirvana.