Mathematical Proof of humanity’s intelligence

Humans pride themselves on their intelligence. Really?

As best as we can ascertain, in your scientific and juridical law, the meaning of each discovery or invention, the essence of any important idea, can be expressed by a simple sentence, consisting of a hundred words out of a 50,000 word vocabulary, including mathematical and other specific symbols. The total quantity of possible sentences of that vocabulary is represented by a very modest figure, 100. If we consider only those sentences that have an analytic function, that is to convey meaning — the number will be reduced to 50. Now, if we also eliminate those sentences that are grammatically correct but lack even the slightest discernible meaning, the quantity of meaningful sentences remaining will be reduced to 25. Finally, if we then select the false statements from true ones, being generous with the former in our evaluation, we have only 3-10 statements remaining that actually correspond to reality. Meanwhile, we know some examples of life forms from several other planets that are capable of showing at least the same number of various unconditioned reactions to different combinations of external stimuli that are quite consonant with reality; however these life forms cannot be called intelligent. There are such species on your planet too. Evidently, it would be more correct to consider humanity not intelligent, but a potentially intelligent race, because the limitations of your thought processes, as you should have already gathered, are not of congenital origin.

You try to quantify just about everything and at the same time you cannot even provide precise information about the strength of the wind, expressing it simply in binary concepts of “yes” and “no”, “it is” or “it isn’t” and, moreover, without the expectation of any meaningful understanding of those statements.

Arithmetical quantification led you to new problems, brought about more by the primitiveness of your thinking than by the exigencies of reality. So you waste your energy trying to solve them, seeing them as real anomalies of nature that are difficult to harmonize with your world view. One example: your dealing with rational and irrational numbers as if they had a real scale. Binary logic forces you to fragment and artificially separate solid perceptions into independent facts, occurrences, conceptions, and categories, artificially separating them one from the other.

Arithmetical quantification led you to new problems, brought about more by the primitiveness of your thinking than by the exigencies of reality. So you waste your energy trying to solve them, seeing them as real anomalies of nature that are difficult to harmonize with your world view. One example: your dealing with rational and irrational numbers as if they had a real scale. Binary logic forces you to fragment and artificially separate solid perceptions into independent facts, occurrences, conceptions, and categories, artificially separating them one from the other.

You believe that moving from the highest level of abstraction to the lowest common denominator is the only correct way to proceed. On the contrary, it is really just the opposite. It is no accident that all your abstract constructs, called philosophical systems, are self-contradicting, even though they are based on a common logic.

Step by step, descending into darkness along levels of abstraction, step by step, losing connection with reality, little by little your philosophical systems lose their orientation and finally at the “dead end” of their progression you are forced to answer the meaningless question about the priority of matter over spirit, by a “yes” or a “no.” Because of the weakness of your logical foundation you are limited in your ability to finely differentiate between objects and events, basing your distinctions upon a variety of notations, which are quite chaotic and illogical even from the point of view of your own logic. This is very easily proven, for instance, in the case of human language, where the distinctions are quite inexact.

Your method of communication, which you claim as one of the superior achievements of the human mind, is based upon the establishment of such meaningless differentiations. If you calculate the number of meaningful sentences in your language, you will see how primitive it is as a method of informational exchange, and is, rather, a way to limit that process. And it is not an achievement of intellect, only a transient, dysfunctional step in the early stage of human evolution.

Considering language as an instrument for both exchanging and conveying information, you have not yet noticed how much it impacts your way of thinking, how inevitably it forces you into the very same process of fragmentation and compartmentalization. Thus your ethics and esthetics, particularly, contain a multitude of conceptual pairs that are mutually contradictory, such as thesis and antithesis.

The Final Appeal Volume 1 Nicolai Levoshav

Advertisements

The Love Question

If you were a being full of love and empathy, and power, would you allow any of the following to occur?  Children in horrendous pain in cancer wards, children raped by parents or relatives, women abused by spouses, the poorest of the poor drowning in their suffering, male superiority taught in the vast majority of religions, the rich ruling over the poor and middle class?

You know the answer. There is no All Powerful, All Loving Being that exists.  If they did, the aforementioned, would not go on and on. It is far time to take responsibility for your own actions, and do not harm yourself, or another person.

Will this wake up people who believe in an All Powerful All Loving Creator?

SOMETHING IS WRONG HERE:

War, disease, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the ice capades.

SOMETHING IS DEFINITELY WRONG:

This is not good work, if this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.  Results like these do not belong on the resume of a Supreme Being.  This is the kind of crap you would expect from an Office Temp. with a bad attitude.

George Carlin

What an All Loving, All Knowing, All Powerful, Creator would not allow.

They would not allow any of the following:  Children in Cancer Wards suffering in horrendous pain, cancer patients wallowing in suffering, the poor to remain in their poverty,  the ultra-rich using the middle class and poor class for enriching the ultra rich, babies and children being raped, the rapes of forests, oceans, lakes, rivers, and streams, the crippled to remain cripple.

I listed the 3 characteristics of the Bible God.  Anyone using common sense would know that if they had all power available to them, their love would compel them to not allow any of the aforementioned problems to remain.

The Dumbing Down Of The World

Social Media is responsible for the dumbing down of our World.  It is the booster shot that has accelerated the worldwide spread of ignorance.  Every day, toxic chemicals are coning down on our land and polluting everything.  Every breath we take has been contaminated.  Geoengineering Watch.org has all the facts. 

If the World would get educated on this, this assault can be stopped. The father of four, who started Geoengineering Watch had moved to northern California to be off grid.  He was powered by solar and wind.  When he lost 80% of his solar, he started investigating, and his alarm signals went off in his brain.

We no longer see a royal blue sky, and the vast majority of the World population is not even aware of this.  I saw a picture from space showing our planet.  It was surrounded by a white haze (geoengineering), and above it was the royal blue sky we used to see.

GEOENGINEERING IS THE GREATEST THREAT FACING HUMANITY!

What kind of Creator would a Radical Love Atheist want?

A Creator of the here and now.  A  Creator whom everyone can see and  know, not someone who refuses to be seen and known. A  Creator  who teaches, and not a bunch of do’s and dont’, and shall , and shall not’s.  A Creator who would make DNA that would be resistant to cancer, leukemia, crippling diseases,  alcohol, drugs, hatred, violence, greed,  authoritarianism, and control.  A Creator who would teach everyone how to live in harmony with nature,  and not use it for selfish desires.  A Creator who would teach everyone about Community, and how to teach our children well.

A Lakota grandfather told his grandson before he died that the world was full of people, but only a handful of  human beings. The grandfather said I hope that by the example of how I lived my life that you also would choose to be a human being.

I want a Creator who would be like that Lakota grandfather  Actions speak loudly , whereas words can be used to trick and deceive people.

Why I Am An Atheist

Christians who knew me before come up with every kind of crazy excuse you can imagine.  They gossip, and judge ,and condemn me.  If you would have known me when I was a religious freak, you would have never imagined i would ever become an Atheist.  I was a Jesus Freak on STEROIDS! 

Research and questioning woke me up.  Reason and Logic woke me up.  You see, If I would want a God, I would want an ‘ON TIME’ God.   Is God an On Time God? Absolutely  NOT!

He is not on time for any of the following:

The poorest of the poor drowning in their suffering.

Innocent children raped, and they get no help from this EVIL GOD!

Children raped repeatedly, and getting no help from this EVIL GOD!

Made in His Image huh, children born crippled and deformed.  Is that HIS IMAGE?

I want a God that helps in the here and now, when we need it the most, not some imaginary God in the sky, who does nothing for this World.

Look at this World, it is so messed up, and you seriously think a God is in control of this World? HE, SHE, IT, or SPIRIT, need to be FIRED, if they are!

A SEA OF BLOOD FROM THE BEGINNING OF HUMANS ON EARTH, BECAUSE OF AN IMAGINARY GOD!

Hypatia: The Greek Philospher who was respected and honored by men and women.  Christians pulled her out of her Chariot and shred her body to pieces with oyster shells , then burned those parts, and threw it into the river.  Endorsed by The Fucking Church.  FUCK YOUR IMAGINARY GOD